From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19703 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2010 23:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19550 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2010 23:03:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CC32BACD8 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:03:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r8LyQnv2BHAK for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:03:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BCA2BAC8F for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:03:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05A5BF5895; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:03:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/commit/Ada] Wrong value printed by info locals for dynamic object. Message-ID: <20100420230318.GV19194@adacore.com> References: <1271715891-8764-1-git-send-email-y> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1271715891-8764-1-git-send-email-y> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 > return val_print (value_type (val), value_contents_all (val), > value_embedded_offset (val), value_address (val), > stream, recurse, options, language); > > Short of creating a language-specific value_contents routine, I think > that this was the best/easiest compromise... Thoughts on that? Well, stupid me (again!): I just realized that I checked in a couple of patches for which I said yesterday that I'd wait a few days. Sorry about that. Hopefully this is not a problem, but I'm happy to revert and/or adjust based on feedback. My entire week is dedicated to the FSF tree, so I have time... -- Joel