From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16345 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2010 20:27:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16334 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:27:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41F22BAC17; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7JRoIsoGueV8; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B28B2BAC93; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27675F5895; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:27:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Kevin Buettner Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tristan Gingold Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix has_section_at_zero for separate debug files Message-ID: <20100419202741.GA3688@adacore.com> References: <20100107130918.GA11037@chinon.act-europe.fr> <20100111220043.44a9449d@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100111220043.44a9449d@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00575.txt.bz2 Hi Kevin, I'm going through the (growing) backlog of patches written by AdaCore, and notice that this one got stuck. Would you mind doing the testing you offered below? Once we have the result, I can start pinging Tristan and whoever can review the code to get things going again... I attached the initial email, to make it easier to get the patch again. Hopefully, it still applies - otherwise, I'll nudge Tristan into producing an updated version... Thanks! On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:00:43PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:28:48 -0700 > Tom Tromey wrote: > > > Tristan> No regression on GNU Linux i386. > > > > I wonder whether this code path is tested there. > > I don't know. > > I don't know either. My earlier patch (which seems to be causing > problems on Darwin now) was motivated by some problems that I was > seeing with mep-elf. > > I'll test Tristan's patch using a mep-elf build in the next few days > to see if it too solves the problems that I was seeing last year. > > Kevin -- Joel