From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5767 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2010 15:26:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 5757 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2010 15:26:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:26:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 28387 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 15:26:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 Apr 2010 15:26:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: PR corefiles/11511: gcore doesn't work with orig_rax on Linux/amd64 Message-ID: <20100419152623.GA30156@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20100417161115.GA25919@intel.com> <201004171625.o3HGPc93029549@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201004182132.o3ILWqtn029873@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201004182132.o3ILWqtn029873@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Any other people have an opinion about this? I think that it made a lot of sense to be robust about this when the amd64 port was new, but it isn't necessary any more. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery