From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-72193-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16241 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2010 16:19:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 16201 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2010 16:19:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:18:55 +0000
Received: (qmail 4730 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 16:18:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Apr 2010 16:18:53 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Regenerate gdbserver/configure
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:19:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
References: <001601cadd7f$f3ae1e20$db0a5a60$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
In-Reply-To: <001601cadd7f$f3ae1e20$db0a5a60$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201004161718.50896.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2

On Friday 16 April 2010 17:14:54, Pierre Muller wrote:
>   Should I give a reason for the regeneration in the ChangeLog entry?
> Is this patch OK?

It's okay as is.

-- 
Pedro Alves