From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10622 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2010 23:20:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10612 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2010 23:20:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:20:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 5282 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 15 Apr 2010 23:20:14 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Michael Snyder Subject: Re: PR8554: New command to save breakpoints to a file Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "tromey@redhat.com" References: <201004090341.14389.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4BC79A0F.9090406@vmware.com> <4BC79DC3.7070308@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4BC79DC3.7070308@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004160020.11971.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 On Friday 16 April 2010 00:14:11, Michael Snyder wrote: > Also, it doesn't seem right to me that "save tracepoints" will ignore > breakpoints, but "save breakpoints" doesn't ignore tracepoints (but > rather saves them both). > > Since you have this filter mechanism in place already, why don't you > arrange to have "save breakpoints" save only breakpoints? Because "info breakpoints" also lists all kinds of breakpoints (real-breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, catchpoints), and "info tracepoints" only lists tracepoints. Please refer to last January's discution about "actionpoints" over at gdb@. -- Pedro Alves