From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26925 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2010 23:08:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26915 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2010 23:08:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:08:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 31520 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 23:08:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 12 Apr 2010 23:08:31 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Detect loops in the solib chain Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Paul Pluzhnikov , Kevin Buettner References: <20080718160210.66b480e9@mesquite.lan> <20100409154123.GA8218@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100409210255.GA26135@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20100409210255.GA26135@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004130007.34922.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 On Friday 09 April 2010 22:02:55, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Done this part this time. It works during basic test but it is not regression > tested on Solaris as system expect + custom dejagnu produce \r\r\n EOLs > breaking the testsuite completely. Was that OpenSolaris? I've seen that before too. Here is the workaround I was using a while ago: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-08/msg00144.html I don't really know what exactly causes this. I never saw that problem on Solaris (non-Open), but then again, there we're using a built from source dejagnu, I think. -- Pedro Alves