From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31754 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2010 21:57:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31726 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2010 21:57:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o34LvRXl011326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:57:27 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o34LvPGH029773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:57:27 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o34LvPIx025290; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:57:25 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o34LvOAl025288; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:57:24 +0200 Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start Message-ID: <20100404215724.GA24966@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100404210751.GA21664@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201004042245.58720.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201004042245.58720.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:45:58 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2010 22:07:51, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Bugreport has been kept updated by the courtesy of John Reiser since 2005. > > What bug report? A PR? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162775 But found now GDB PR 9436 for it. > The need for -static is a test implementation detail on systems > with a userspace dynamic loader à la ld.so. Can I convince you > to remove "static" from the test name? Do those systems support (=ignore) the "-static" flag? Thanks, Jan