From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71296-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7586 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2010 20:21:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 7559 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2010 20:20:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:20:53 +0000
Received: (qmail 14325 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 20:20:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 Mar 2010 20:20:51 -0000
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:21:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch-testcase] Re: [rfc] Work around buggy GCC 4.1 namespace  dwarf  info (GCC PR c++/28460)
Message-ID: <20100319202046.GA10180@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, 	Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <201003191237.o2JCbBAr020607@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>  <20100319192008.GA1980@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100319192008.GA1980@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:20:08PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this problem was fixed before at:
> 	[expr-cumulative] Fix namespace regression for G++-4.1
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2009-q4/msg00124.html
> (and before at
> 	[patch by Michael Matz] Re: archer gdb and gcc 4.1 globalnamespace DIE
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2009-q2/msg00089.html
> )
> 
> but at least reposting the testcase from it here.
> 
> OK to apply with Ulrich Weigand's patch?

OK.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery