From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71262-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27568 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 22:33:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 27560 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 22:33:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:33:19 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2IMXCpV001242; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:33:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2IMXAYO003057; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:33:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:33:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201003182233.o2IMXAYO003057@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: dje@google.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20100318221601.F233684413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> 	(dje@google.com)
Subject: Re: [RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270
References:  <20100318221601.F233684413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
> From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans)
> 
> Anyone mind if I mark these as kfail for amd64?

What makes you think these fail on *all* amd64 platforms?

> 2010-03-18  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.base/longjmp.exp: Mark tests that fail on x86_64 due to
> 	bug 9270 as kfail.
> 
> Index: longjmp.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -p -r1.4 longjmp.exp
> --- longjmp.exp	1 Jan 2010 07:32:01 -0000	1.4
> +++ longjmp.exp	18 Mar 2010 22:13:19 -0000
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \
>  gdb_test "next" "longjmps\\+\\+;.*" "next over setjmp (1)"
>  gdb_test "next" "longjmp \\(env, 1\\);.*" "next to longjmp (1)"
>  
> +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
>  set msg "next over longjmp(1)"
>  gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
>      -re ".*patt1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \
>  
>  gdb_test "next" "call_longjmp.*" "next over setjmp (2)"
>  
> +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
>  set msg "next over call_longjmp (2)"
>  gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
>      -re ".*patt2.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> @@ -127,4 +129,5 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \
>      "breakpoint at pattern 3 start"
>  gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern 3 start"
>  
> +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
>  gdb_test "next" "longjmp caught.*" "next over patt3"
>