From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10077 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 22:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 10013 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 22:16:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:16:05 +0000 Received: from wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.97]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o2IMG3R6030015 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:03 -0700 Received: from ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com (ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com [172.18.118.116]) by wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o2IMG2Rs010930 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:02 -0700 Received: by ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 67641) id F233684413; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270 Message-Id: <20100318221601.F233684413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:16:00 -0000 From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2 Anyone mind if I mark these as kfail for amd64? 2010-03-18 Doug Evans * gdb.base/longjmp.exp: Mark tests that fail on x86_64 due to bug 9270 as kfail. Index: longjmp.exp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.4 longjmp.exp --- longjmp.exp 1 Jan 2010 07:32:01 -0000 1.4 +++ longjmp.exp 18 Mar 2010 22:13:19 -0000 @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \ gdb_test "next" "longjmps\\+\\+;.*" "next over setjmp (1)" gdb_test "next" "longjmp \\(env, 1\\);.*" "next to longjmp (1)" +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*" set msg "next over longjmp(1)" gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg { -re ".*patt1.*$gdb_prompt $" { @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \ gdb_test "next" "call_longjmp.*" "next over setjmp (2)" +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*" set msg "next over call_longjmp (2)" gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg { -re ".*patt2.*$gdb_prompt $" { @@ -127,4 +129,5 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \ "breakpoint at pattern 3 start" gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern 3 start" +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*" gdb_test "next" "longjmp caught.*" "next over patt3"