From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Circular trace buffers
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003182214.28867.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003171851.37499.pedro@codesourcery.com>
I see the patch went in, but how were the issues raised below addressed?
I don't understand why we'd want to have a "show circular-trace-buffer"
command that doesn't work correctly half the times, and hence can't
be trusted. This means a frontend can not rely
on "-gdb-show circular-trace-buffer" to draw a toggle button, for
example (this is what I mean by calling it useless...). I find
the disconnected-tracing example below quite alarming.
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:51:37, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:04:52, Stan Shebs wrote:
> > > - this shows that "show circular-trace-buffer" is useless.
> > > - this requires users know that fact.
> > > - this doesn't sound user friendly.
> > >
> > I'm just not seeing a problem myself - it seems obvious that circularity
> > of trace buffer only matters for future tracepoint hits, and doesn't
> > matter for completed trace runs, trace files, etc. But I can rephrase
> > the docs to make that clearer.
>
> (Yes, please. Okay, let's go with that then.)
>
> Let me show you examples: hopefully it is easy to see with
> these how "show circular-trace-buffer" is broken as is.
>
>
> Please can we have the following inconsistencies resolved?:
>
> Target supports circular:
>
> (gdb) tar rem :9999
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer on
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> ... on.
>
> Fine.
>
>
> Again, a target that supports circular, target wasn't
> tracing on initial connection (disconnect-tracing off):
>
> <not connected yet>
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer on
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> ... on.
> (gdb) tar rem :9999
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> ... on.
> (gdb) set disconnected-tracing on
> <set tracepoints>
> (gdb) tstart
> (gdb) detach
> <end remote debug session>
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer off
> (gdb) tar rem :9999
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> ... off
>
> Really "off"? Ouch! See? QTstatus doesn't report the
> circularity-ness, but the circularity is logically part of
> the status of the current run.
>
> Now against a target that _doesn't_ support QTBuffer (in circular mode):
>
> <not connected yet>
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer on
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> ... on.
> (gdb) tar rem :9999
> <note, no complain, no warning>
> (gdb) show circular-trace-buffer
> Target's use of circular trace buffer is on.
>
> Really?
>
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer off
> Target does not support this command.
> (gdb) set circular-trace-buffer on
> Target does not support this command.
> (gdb)
>
> Ouch!
>
> You can't easily try the latter case, because a new
> "set remote circular...-packet command is missing.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 21:42 Stan Shebs
2010-03-17 7:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-17 16:00 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-17 16:55 ` Stan Shebs
2010-03-17 17:19 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-17 18:05 ` Stan Shebs
2010-03-17 18:51 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-18 22:14 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2010-03-18 23:34 ` Stan Shebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003182214.28867.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox