From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71246-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20547 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 20:03:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 20489 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 20:03:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:03:08 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2IK1Dpx009213; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:01:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2IK1CMn018444; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:01:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:03:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201003182001.o2IK1CMn018444@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: dan@codesourcery.com
CC: dje@google.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,         pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20100318195050.GA11586@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:51:05 -0400)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
References: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>  <201003181747.29518.pedro@codesourcery.com>  <e394668d1003181123m5347420am335bb97775a1a782@mail.gmail.com>  <201003181855.o2IIthRb027235@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>  <e394668d1003181219p5f7a8489oca6bde6b3343e9ed@mail.gmail.com>  <20100318192535.GA25322@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>  <e394668d1003181238p1ccf89b0s682db8cbe1c7fd10@mail.gmail.com> <20100318195050.GA11586@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:51:05 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
>
> I may be alone, and at risk of bikeshedding, but I think this looks
> weird:
> 
> Num         Address
> 1            0x4414
> 2      0x1231230000
> 
> I'm more a fan of:
> 
> Num  Address
> 1               0x4414
> 2         0x1231230000
> 
> [They both look a bit weird to me though.  My ideal UI for this stuff
> resizes based on contents...]

Yup; I actually think the way this is currently printed isn't so bad
after all.