From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22791 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 19:56:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22782 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 19:56:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:56:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 15440 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 19:56:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Mar 2010 19:56:33 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes? Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Doug Evans , Jan Kratochvil , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100318195050.GA11586@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20100318195050.GA11586@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003181956.30297.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00690.txt.bz2 On Thursday 18 March 2010 19:51:05, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I may be alone, and at risk of bikeshedding, but I think this looks > weird: You're not. That was the reason I asked for before-any-patch, vs currently proposed change. > [They both look a bit weird to me though. My ideal UI for this stuff > resizes based on contents...] We do this currently, but the code bases on address bits, assuming we'll print the leading zeros. -- Pedro Alves