From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16776 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 19:47:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 16768 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 19:47:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:47:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 5672 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 19:47:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Mar 2010 19:47:38 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes? Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100318192535.GA25322@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003181947.36801.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00688.txt.bz2 Did you try grepping for other uses of ui_out_field_core_addr? Would other places need adjustment as well? And what about posting the before-with-no-patch-what-soever vs after-patch-that-aligns-right examples of "info break", instead of just leftalign-after-patch vs leftalign-after-patch? -- Pedro Alves