From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71237-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 872 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 18:52:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 857 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 18:52:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:52:03 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2IIpjWH000178; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:51:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2IIphFv019799; 	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:51:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:52:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201003181851.o2IIphFv019799@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: dje@google.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> 	(dje@google.com)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
References:  <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00682.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
> From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans)
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I couldn't find an explanation of *why* ui_out_field_core_addr pads
> the address with leading zeroes.
> 
> Does anyone know?

To make sure the addresses line up properly?