From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12689 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 13:55:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 12667 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 13:55:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:55:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E372BABBA; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Co-NT+3VYRvf; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E972BABB3; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17D63F5917; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, vladimir@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [patch] Re: -data-list-register-names regression? Message-ID: <20100318135509.GI3830@adacore.com> References: <20100317225950.GH3830@adacore.com> <201003181328.o2IDSD0D000501@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003181328.o2IDSD0D000501@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 > OK, I've checked this in to mainline now. It seems reasonable to me > to put this in 7.1 as well, but I think you have final call on that ... > If you'd like me to put in, please let me know. OK, if we both agree that it's safe enough to go into 7.1, then let's apply it on the branch as well. Thanks! -- Joel