From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14970 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2010 22:59:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14955 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2010 22:59:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:59:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52E52BAB4C; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:59:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OGstgafM8y1x; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:59:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D592BAB3E; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:59:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB15CF5917; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, vladimir@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [patch] Re: -data-list-register-names regression? Message-ID: <20100317225950.GH3830@adacore.com> References: <201003171345.44000.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <201003172138.o2HLcOBY021097@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20100317223740.GP9310@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100317223740.GP9310@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2 > > Tested on powerpc-linux. Thoughts on whether we should this? > > I like this patch, and think we should use it. The IDE should be > re-fetching the register names, but we don't need to be mean about it :-) Ditto. Do we want it for 7.1? -- Joel