From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30328 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2010 22:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 30314 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2010 22:37:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:37:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 16337 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 22:37:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Mar 2010 22:37:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, vladimir@codesourcery.com, brobecker@adacore.com Subject: Re: [patch] Re: -data-list-register-names regression? Message-ID: <20100317223740.GP9310@caradoc.them.org> References: <201003171345.44000.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <201003172138.o2HLcOBY021097@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003172138.o2HLcOBY021097@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:38:24PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Tested on powerpc-linux. Thoughts on whether we should this? I like this patch, and think we should use it. The IDE should be re-fetching the register names, but we don't need to be mean about it :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery