From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6674 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 6661 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2010 17:10:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:09:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA8B2BAB73; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:09:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vNtlZb5j5Xaj; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:09:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446082BAB43; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:09:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B7D7F5917; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ralf Corsepius Cc: Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [Patch] Exit gdb/configure.tgt for unsupported targets Message-ID: <20100315170936.GM3045@adacore.com> References: <4B8505E9.3050600@rtems.org> <4B855B1A.7050006@rtems.org> <4B860D57.3070408@rtems.org> <4B9920D3.3050106@rtems.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4B9920D3.3050106@rtems.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 > >Ralf> 2010-02-25 Ralf Corsépius > >Ralf> * configure.ac: Exit if ${gdb_target_obs}" is not set. > >Ralf> * configure: Regenerate. > > > >This is ok, thanks. > > Could somebody please apply this patch (trunk and 7.1-branch). Checked in. I hesitated about applying to the branch or not, since this is hardly a critical problem, but since it seemed pretty safe and might be helpful, I ended up agreeing with the suggestion. So, it's been applied to the branch as well. > I don't have write access to gdb. Perhaps you might want to have write access? Please send me an email if you do (and let me know if you already have write access in any other GNU project hosted on sourceware.org). -- Joel