From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6666 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2010 19:07:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 6583 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2010 19:07:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:07:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 15313 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 19:07:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Mar 2010 19:07:11 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] remove unused(?) code in tramp_frame_cache Message-ID: <20100304190658.GA15979@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20100304181357.90D838484B@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100304181357.90D838484B@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:13:57AM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > > I was going to check this in as obvious, but I couldn't > discount the possibility that the call to get_frame_pc was > being done for possible side effects. > I don't have a target to test this on. > > Does this look ok? Yes, this is fine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery