From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2430 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2010 18:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2374 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2010 18:05:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:05:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 22375 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 18:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Mar 2010 18:05:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [RFA] defs.h: Define GDB_DEFAULT_TARGET_[WIDE_]CHARSET for Cygwin and MingW builds Message-ID: <20100303180506.GA14979@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <20100301173054.GD5683@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100301193126.GA9416@caradoc.them.org> <20100303170645.GA23545@caradoc.them.org> <20100303172217.GR17293@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100303173307.GA25653@caradoc.them.org> <20100303180044.GU17293@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100303180044.GU17293@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:00:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I didn't say anything against doing it right. But this: > > > At this point, I think it's correct to call GetACP even for > > a Cygwin GDB. > > is *not* right. Can you explain it to me? This would only happen when we've established that the application we're debugging is not linked to the Cygwin DLL. Cygwin's nl_langinfo (CODESET) won't have any effect on a non-Cygwin application. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery