Re: PATCH: Support x86 pseudo registers

Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-12T18:14:10Z

> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:30:04 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> hjl.tools@gmail.com, msnyder@vmware.com
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Maybe, but frankly I don't really understand what it says, exactly.
> > Does it mean that if the name does clash with the architecture, the
> > architecture's meaning is used?
>
> I think that's what was intended.

Then maybe we should say when there's conflict, the generic name
_might_ be unavailable.