Re: PATCH: Support x86 pseudo registers

Michael Snyder
2010-03-02T21:57:42Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:47:35PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Who can help out here? I can help with wording, if someone tells the
>> story.
>
> Presumably H. J. knows why he wrote the patch?
>
> I presume it lets us say $ah or $ax in addition to $eax, and lets $eax
> work on 64-bit systems where we really have $rax.

Mmm hmm, and the context would be expressions or anywhere where a
register name is appropriate (eg. info reg). Yes?