From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-70578-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28957 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2010 17:27:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 28943 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2010 17:27:51 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:27:47 +0000
Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 82F396D42F5; Mon,  1 Mar 2010 18:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:27:00 -0000
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] defs.h: Define GDB_DEFAULT_TARGET_[WIDE_]CHARSET for         Cygwin  and MingW builds
Message-ID: <20100301172744.GB5683@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 	Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
References: <20100228130500.GG5683@calimero.vinschen.de>  <20100228142905.GB1556@caradoc.them.org>  <20100228150318.GA32463@calimero.vinschen.de>  <20100228184749.GA17375@caradoc.them.org>  <20100228192159.GP5683@calimero.vinschen.de>  <20100228222702.GC29360@caradoc.them.org>  <20100301103125.GB9730@calimero.vinschen.de>  <m3fx4khsa0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>  <20100301172307.GB722@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100301172307.GB722@caradoc.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

On Mar  1 12:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:21:27AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > This seems to introduce an ordering dependency between _initialize
> > functions.  My understanding is that we don't allow this.
> 
> Correct.  That's why I suggested gdbarch.

Is there any chance to get a sane default on a native Windows GDB
without having to turn GDB upside down?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat