From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30345 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2010 20:10:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 30297 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2010 20:10:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:10:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 26262 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 20:10:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 25 Feb 2010 20:10:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Add arm-symbianelf support. Message-ID: <20100225201015.GW9493@caradoc.them.org> References: <201002252006.50107.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002252006.50107.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:06:50PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > This patch of Daniel's adds basic support for arm-symbianelf > to gdb. > > Daniel, do you think the arm_symbian_osabi_sniffer is > still sufficiently tight to not cause problems in > --enable-target=all builds? Otherwise, this looks > good to me. :-) Yes, I think this is still safe. It's not obvious from the commands, but the key is ET_DYN with the program headers not mapped; ET_EXEC without mapped headers is common (bare metal applications are usually like this). I wish there were a better marker. Maybe there is nowadays? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery