From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4297 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2010 17:25:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4278 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2010 17:25:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:25:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A012BAB8E; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7+JaeKQ-cxfC; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF322BAB8D; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD854F5896; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Make -exec-run and -exec-until into 'real' MI commands Message-ID: <20100225172522.GA17439@adacore.com> References: <201001131629.25873.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100113202620.GB3955@caradoc.them.org> <20100114044603.GS2007@adacore.com> <201002221724.27828.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002221724.27828.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2 > Will that help with \t issue identified by Dan? I don't think so. I'm a little late answering (was off network for a while), and I don't have a particular opinion on the initial problem anyway, but it seemed to me that it might. Can't be sure, though, I feel like something in the discussion is escaping me... -- Joel