From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23216 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2010 23:42:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23199 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2010 23:42:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:42:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808872BAB40; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:41:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id af8F00ddtWW1; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:41:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A722BAB36; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:41:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E8FCF5896; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:41:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Luis Machado , Matt Tyrlik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support the new BookE ptrace interface Message-ID: <20100223234154.GA3737@adacore.com> References: <201002221827.04440.bauerman@br.ibm.com> <201002231907.o1NJ7b8K004364@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002231907.o1NJ7b8K004364@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 > With this change, the patch would be OK for HEAD. > For the branch, Joel has the last word ... The patch was approved pre 7.1 branching, but I feel a little uncomfortable applying a patch of this size that late, so I'd like a second opinion. If Ulrich is OK, then the patch can be applied to the branch as well. -- Joel