From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-70370-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9080 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2010 14:24:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 9069 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2010 14:24:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:24:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 7605 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 14:24:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Feb 2010 14:24:29 -0000
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: Make -exec-run and -exec-until into 'real' MI commands
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:24:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic-pae; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; )
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <201001131629.25873.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100113202620.GB3955@caradoc.them.org> <20100114044603.GS2007@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100114044603.GS2007@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;   charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201002221724.27828.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00529.txt.bz2

On Thursday 14 January 2010 07:46:03 Joel Brobecker wrote:

> > I suggest asking for a second opinion then.  I don't think this
> > quoting is good enough to be a good idea.  I think we can get away
> > without it for -exec-run.  I don't know about -exec-until.
> 
> I agree that we should avoid a quoting mechanism if it leads to
> surprising results. There is some code that does quoting in fork-child,
> perhaps we could reuse that code?

Will that help with \t issue identified by Dan? I don't think so.


Thanks,

-- 
Vladimir Prus
CodeSourcery
vladimir@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x722