From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-70366-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23857 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2010 13:04:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 23776 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2010 13:04:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:04:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 21405 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 13:04:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Feb 2010 13:04:13 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Bug gdb/11253] SEGV during reverse debugging w/ record target   =?iso-8859-1?q?=09over?= simulator
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:04:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,  sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org,  Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
References: <20100205023723.11253.green@moxielogic.com> <daef60381002072144q5f90e05fw421cb4e7a40dcc0f@mail.gmail.com> <daef60381002192155v2024da09p87ea18f8dbe2ba4a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <daef60381002192155v2024da09p87ea18f8dbe2ba4a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201002221304.11412.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2

On Saturday 20 February 2010 05:55:57, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Ping.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 13:44, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > I make a patch for it.
> >
> > Please help me test it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hui
> >
> > 2010-02-08  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> >
> >        * target.c (init_dummy_target): Add to_stopped_by_watchpoint.
> > ---
> >  target.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > --- a/target.c
> > +++ b/target.c
> > @@ -2836,6 +2836,7 @@ init_dummy_target (void)
> >   dummy_target.to_has_stack = (int (*) (struct target_ops *)) return_zero;
> >   dummy_target.to_has_registers = (int (*) (struct target_ops *)) return_zero;
> >   dummy_target.to_has_execution = (int (*) (struct target_ops *)) return_zero;
> > +  dummy_target.to_stopped_by_watchpoint = return_zero;
> >   dummy_target.to_magic = OPS_MAGIC;
> >  }
> >
> 

Does this actually fix the problem?  How?

-- 
Pedro Alves