From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11829 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2010 14:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 11820 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2010 14:45:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:45:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDB52BAC1F; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:45:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y8pFEv+jV6By; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:45:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0902BAB5E; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:45:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D84B9F5896; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:45:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:45:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Chris Moller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: pr 11067 patch Message-ID: <20100219144538.GD2779@adacore.com> References: <4B737180.4050802@redhat.com> <20100211092950.GC2907@adacore.com> <20100212041137.GE2907@adacore.com> <4B75783D.6050103@redhat.com> <20100213114933.GA595@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4B76F5CE.30704@redhat.com> <20100219142846.GC2779@adacore.com> <20100219143609.GA1210@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100219143609.GA1210@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 > IMHO I would do the change for CLI but not for the MI. But besides no > approval rights I am even not a regular MI/frontend user. So just my $0.02. If I'm sensing things right, I don't think that Chris actually disagrees with you, it's just that we've been um'ing and am'ing back and forth a little too much and discouraged him as a result. I'm ready to bet that Chris would be happy letting anyone take his patch over and improve it. (I tend to agree with you on your comment, btw) -- Joel