From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7528 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2010 14:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7519 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2010 14:36:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:36:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JEaCeu020951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JEaAJf005770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1JEaAVr001642; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:36:10 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1JEa97B001641; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:36:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:36:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Chris Moller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: pr 11067 patch Message-ID: <20100219143609.GA1210@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <4B737180.4050802@redhat.com> <20100211092950.GC2907@adacore.com> <20100212041137.GE2907@adacore.com> <4B75783D.6050103@redhat.com> <20100213114933.GA595@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4B76F5CE.30704@redhat.com> <20100219142846.GC2779@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100219142846.GC2779@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 Hi Chris, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:28:46 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Jan's question, IMO (Jan, please correct me if I am wrong), were meant as > a discussion starter, rather than an objection. yes. As I said in practice it is an improvement even for MI (at least for Eclipse CDT (CDI)) but formally I do not find it right for MI (as such diplay feature should be done by MI frontend and not the MI backend IMO). IMHO I would do the change for CLI but not for the MI. But besides no approval rights I am even not a regular MI/frontend user. So just my $0.02. Regards, Jan