Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: [patch] Fix PIE for 64bit gdb -> 32bit inferior
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100211150657.GA14066@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)

Hi,

according to the suggestion by Mark Kettenis the fix for biarch PIE is in fact
simple.

The displacement for cross-arch inferiors can use 64bit math operations if its
bits 32..63 are properly set to either 0x00000000 << 32 or 0xffffffff << 32 as
appropriate.

No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora12-linux-gnu.  It fixes some
FAILs of gdb.base/break-interp.exp on {x86_64-m32}-fedora12-linux-gnu
(therefore host=x86_64-fedora12-linux-gnu target=i686-fedora12-linux-gnu).


Thanks,
Jan


2010-02-11  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* solib-svr4.c (enable_break <target_auxv_search>): New variable
	addr_bit.  Adjust LOAD_ADDR sign for cross-arch inferiors.

--- a/gdb/solib-svr4.c
+++ b/gdb/solib-svr4.c
@@ -1428,7 +1428,32 @@ enable_break (struct svr4_info *info, int from_tty)
          from our so_list, then try using the AT_BASE auxilliary entry.  */
       if (!load_addr_found)
         if (target_auxv_search (&current_target, AT_BASE, &load_addr) > 0)
-          load_addr_found = 1;
+	  {
+	    int addr_bit = gdbarch_addr_bit (target_gdbarch);
+
+	    /* Ensure LOAD_ADDR has proper sign in its possible upper bits so
+	       that `+ load_addr' will overflow CORE_ADDR width not creating
+	       invalid addresses like 0x101234567 for 32bit inferiors on 64bit
+	       GDB.  */
+
+	    if (addr_bit < (sizeof (ULONGEST) * HOST_CHAR_BIT))
+	      {
+		CORE_ADDR space_size = (ULONGEST) 1 << addr_bit;
+		CORE_ADDR tmp_entry_point = exec_entry_point (tmp_bfd,
+							      tmp_bfd_target);
+
+		gdb_assert (load_addr < space_size);
+
+		/* TMP_ENTRY_POINT exceeding SPACE_SIZE would be for prelinked
+		   64bit ld.so with 32bit executable, it should not happen.  */
+
+		if (tmp_entry_point < space_size
+		    && tmp_entry_point + load_addr >= space_size)
+		  load_addr -= space_size;
+	      }
+
+	    load_addr_found = 1;
+	  }
 
       /* Otherwise we find the dynamic linker's base address by examining
 	 the current pc (which should point at the entry point for the


             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11 15:07 Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-02-16 23:34 ` Tom Tromey
2010-02-17 11:38   ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-02-17 19:57     ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100211150657.GA14066@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox