From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10649 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2010 06:13:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 10640 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Feb 2010 06:13:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:13:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEEF2BAB2C; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1QpQpB2WaR2m; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1840C2BAB19; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F10ABF59A2; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:13:10 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Andreas Schwab , scott.harrison@tandberg.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New feature: allow thread command to take a LWPID. Message-ID: <20100208061310.GA16325@adacore.com> References: <20100204113543.GB2704@tandberg.com> <20100205032801.GD2715@adacore.com> <20100205114920.GD4335@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > I think the "/t" form is mostly used for print formats, isn't it? And > we either use subcommands or the "-switch" in other cases? Though I > wouldn't be surprised to find some inconsistencies. I used the "find" command as the model when coming up with the /t. I can't remember commands that use -switch, although I'm sure it'll come back. I agree that we've probably been inconsistent anyway. That being said, it's not terribly important to me which approach we choose. I would prefer, however, if we avoided the %lwp syntax, though. -- Joel