From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10387 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2010 17:59:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 10376 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2010 17:59:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:59:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 24232 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 17:59:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Feb 2010 17:59:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tristan Gingold Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove deprecated_sym_private Message-ID: <20100203175909.GC12046@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tristan Gingold , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20100203160830.GA83064@ulanbator.act-europe.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100203160830.GA83064@ulanbator.act-europe.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a patch that remove deprecated_sym_private, but I am not sure > that it is worth applying it: not sure this is a real improvment, and > I think that the private data_key could be shared among all symbol readers. > > That's the reason why comments are welcome. Since you've written it, I think it's worth applying it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery