From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14768 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2010 15:31:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 14758 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2010 15:31:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:31:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 1300 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 15:31:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Feb 2010 15:31:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Support target specific qSupported Message-ID: <20100203153109.GD9493@caradoc.them.org> References: <20100203040339.GA24984@lucon.org> <20100203135848.GA27938@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030605k6eadda3me45828f7c8c6a362@mail.gmail.com> <20100203142202.GB28951@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030634wd2976e5t2a42b639c455b850@mail.gmail.com> <20100203144626.GA31389@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030708n413c1784g3979207a08cdd9c7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc81002030708n413c1784g3979207a08cdd9c7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 [resent for the archives, I hit the spam filter - possibly by talking about "free" stuff?] On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:08:26AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > How about this patch? It allows a target to add a field to qSupported. There are big comments at the top of gdbarch.c and gdbarch.h that point at gdbarch.sh. They are generated files. Also, please call xfree instead of free. Otherwise, it looks fine, though. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery