From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25722 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2010 05:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25711 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2010 05:35:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:35:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39CF2BAB89; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TSAIh7isujlH; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB62BAB88; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5B9C2F59A0; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:34:54 +0400 (RET) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:35:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [amd64-windows] Fix function calls on amd64-windows Message-ID: <20100131053454.GL26827@adacore.com> References: <1264398132-1429-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201001301925.o0UJPi7B007789@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001301925.o0UJPi7B007789@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00662.txt.bz2 > I'd like to have a chance to review these diffs before you do. I just > returned home from a trip to .au, so it may take a few days before I > recover from the jetlag and the pile of email that was waiting for me. Argh, sorry Mark - the patches went in Friday. I still appreciate the review, and promise to either fix or revert quickly based on your comments. I'd rather not revert unless needed, as it's a bit of a painful process with CVS... -- Joel