From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19356 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2010 20:24:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19344 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2010 20:24:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:24:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 32238 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 20:24:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 28 Jan 2010 20:24:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 2/4] dwarf2_physname Message-ID: <20100128202429.GA29835@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <4B1EAD5C.6060708@redhat.com> <4B2692EE.5090807@redhat.com> <20091217202843.GA11961@caradoc.them.org> <20091222192444.GB15339@caradoc.them.org> <4B576983.2090808@redhat.com> <20100126211733.GA17877@caradoc.them.org> <4B609019.1090807@redhat.com> <4B61F20B.7070908@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B61F20B.7070908@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:22:35PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > On 01/27/2010 11:12 AM, Keith Seitz wrote: > >On 01/26/2010 01:17 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >>I think that this means we should move on past the speed concern for > >>now, and focus on any other issues in the patch. Where were we on > >>that front? > > > >Let me grab Sami's last commit, re-run and see where we stand. > > Okay, after some *more* linespec hacking, I have eliminated all the > regressions in the test suite (including some java failures that > exist on my archer-keiths-expr-cumulative branch). Great! Want to resubmit the patch, then? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery