From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26557 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2010 18:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26546 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2010 18:28:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-126-240-8.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.126.240.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:28:31 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBFE13C0C7; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id A30EE2B35A; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:28:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [amd64-windows] Fix function calls on amd64-windows Message-ID: <20100125182821.GA32050@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker References: <1264398132-1429-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1264398132-1429-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:42:09AM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: >Hello, > >The following patch series enhances the amd64 function-call and >return-value code to handle the Microsoft ABI for amd64-windows. >As it turned out, the principles where relatively similar to >the ABI used on Linux systems, but the details where quite significantly >different (list of integer registers, parameters passed by memory, >etc). > >These patches were tested on x86_64-linux using the official testsuite, >as well as on x86_64-windows, but using AdaCore's testsuite. > >I'd like to commit in a few days if there are no objection. I don't believe that I am the maintainer of the x86_64 files but these changes look ok to me. cgf