From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4420 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2010 02:06:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 4323 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2010 02:06:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:05:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0M25uCj030968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:05:56 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0M25qJq026933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:05:54 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0M25q3X029992; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:05:52 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0M25qpU029991; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:05:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:06:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix crash on DWARF C++ forward reference Message-ID: <20100122020552.GA29916@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100122010142.GA28072@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:42:22 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I also came up with a patch. What do you think of the appended? OK, it is a better approach. I cannot find a countercase. Regards, Jan