From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14761 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2010 22:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14752 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2010 22:18:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:18:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 16665 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 22:18:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 21 Jan 2010 22:18:29 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch]: Fix build for GO32 and WIN32 targets Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ktietz70@googlemail.com References: <90baa01f1001210612v145db5f9m3b4607f602c2ae26@mail.gmail.com> <201001212124.21679.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83tyuf6rm6.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83tyuf6rm6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001212218.44673.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00538.txt.bz2 On Thursday 21 January 2010 22:05:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Pedro Alves > > Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:24:21 +0000 > > Cc: Kai Tietz > > > > All the callers of check_syscall are wrapped inside: > > > > #if !defined(__GO32__) && !defined(_WIN32) > > Yes, but why? Presumably because it's doing things that aren't either supported or needed on those targets. I don't think that matters in the context of this patch. I've answered your question of why don't other targets hit the same problem. If there's something to should be done to implement some missing bits for djgpp or mingw, that's a completely separate change. -- Pedro Alves