From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25964 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 04:46:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 25946 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2010 04:46:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:46:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9A42BAB44; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GFuWgOmfiOkt; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8BB2BAB13; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F122F595E; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:46:03 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Make -exec-run and -exec-until into 'real' MI commands Message-ID: <20100114044603.GS2007@adacore.com> References: <201001131629.25873.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100113200953.GA3955@caradoc.them.org> <201001132313.24694.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100113202620.GB3955@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100113202620.GB3955@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 > I suggest asking for a second opinion then. I don't think this > quoting is good enough to be a good idea. I think we can get away > without it for -exec-run. I don't know about -exec-until. I agree that we should avoid a quoting mechanism if it leads to surprising results. There is some code that does quoting in fork-child, perhaps we could reuse that code? -- Joel