From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20007 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2010 13:23:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19996 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2010 13:23:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:23:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C9E2008AF; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:23:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id m++5ogHZ4B5e; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:23:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C5A2BE6FD; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40129F595E; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:23:35 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Daniel Gutson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcore fix for native gdb on solaris Message-ID: <20100112132335.GN2007@adacore.com> References: <4AF9E5BD.3030900@codesourcery.com> <20100111162807.GB13820@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100112033905.GI2007@adacore.com> <20100112122623.GA1350@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100112122623.GA1350@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 > I was not somehow sure whether it is expected and I also wanted to make some > heads-up whether _STRUCTURED_PROC #defines aren't now obsoleted in proc*.c > files (I do not know if they are or not). It isn't, as far as I know. I thought I had seen on Solaris 10 that _STRUCTURED_PROC was always assumed, but upon double-checking, it appears not so. In any case, the only risk is with old versions of Solaris where _STRUCTURED_PROC is ignored - we might have a build failure because we expected to have elfcore_write_lwpstatus, whereas bfd only provided elfcore_write_lpstatus... I doubt it; my guess is NEW_PROC_API would not be defined on these systems. -- Joel