From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25165 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2010 00:07:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 25149 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2010 00:07:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:07:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0807DcH023279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:07:13 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0807BRt023673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:07:12 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0807ADR022375; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:07:10 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0807Aik022372; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:07:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201001080007.o0807Aik022372@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Masaki Muranaka CC: nickc@redhat.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <55B67174-01F1-4A30-B65B-32A10B0EC7EB@monami-software.com> (message from Masaki Muranaka on Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:02:14 +0900) Subject: Re: Can't set architecture to m32c on m32c-elf-gdb. References: <20081203140802.GA6965@caradoc.them.org> <50B2818F-7217-4D63-ABE8-19E444FE9A40@monami-software.com> <4B3C9784.1040309@redhat.com> <21F11493-3DE3-41FA-97D5-B539B54259A2@monami-software.com> <4B44A991.4010101@redhat.com> <271DFD02-74A7-4296-8253-AF4E24A38ADA@monami-software.com> <4B460270.5060808@redhat.com> <440A363D-401D-45C2-ADCB-B80AF3B3048D@monami-software.com> <201001072244.o07Mintk025541@greed.delorie.com> <55B67174-01F1-4A30-B65B-32A10B0EC7EB@monami-software.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > Yes some series cores are already shipped it and some are still > planning. I didn't say R32C is same as M32C. But I think their > register sets and periherals are quite similar. And Renesas says > R32C is the high end model of M16C/M32C series, right? Right, but r32c isn't a "type of m32c" - it's a sibling to m32c, much like m32c is a sibling to m16c. The register set is similar, but not quite the same, and the instruction set is similar, but not quite the same, etc. > I agree RX is completely different opcode/registers from M16C > family. ("RX is a step up from R32C. " is similar to "SH-1/2 is a > step up from H8") So I have no view about RX supports on GNU chains. RX shares many peripherals and electrical configurations with m32c/r32c though.