From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18919 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2010 08:03:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 18819 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2010 08:03:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:03:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9922BABE4; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cp9mkfVXrq47; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7942BABE3; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD558F5936; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:03:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:03:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sean Chen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: The abbreviation in [] Message-ID: <20100106080332.GG24777@adacore.com> References: <5e81cb501001041706k2b430414jaa182127dd70f9a@mail.gmail.com> <20100105050007.GB24777@adacore.com> <5e81cb501001050746j71724945g87cda1acc6cde350@mail.gmail.com> <20100105174208.GC24777@adacore.com> <5e81cb501001052233t5a7ce6a4hbbfe4637bd4e2494@mail.gmail.com> <20100106065111.GE24777@adacore.com> <5e81cb501001052356o1cf32c70wa0916d23928e9708@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e81cb501001052356o1cf32c70wa0916d23928e9708@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 > I just have a concern here. Do you think gdb/CONTRIBUTE is too formal > to include these abbreviations? If not, I am OK to prepare it and log > my impression in the future as well. IMO, I think it will be fine (Supplemental information for GDB:). -- Joel