From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29913 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2010 16:15:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29881 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2010 16:15:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:15:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o05GEPC8014874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:14:25 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o05GEMeX018444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:14:24 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o05GEMkD002179; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:14:22 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o05GEMJO002178; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:14:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:15:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tristan Gingold Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression on prelinked-sepdebug-shlibs Message-ID: <20100105161422.GB1277@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20091225200440.GA3747@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <1EA52AF6-6633-4D00-A3D7-842856D6C908@adacore.com> <20100104181009.GA15630@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:02:46 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > But without that sepdebug.exp fails: by default (default_symfile_offsets), > addresses from addr_info are used as offsets. So if I put the vma into > address, the addresses of the separate debug file are doubled. The > convertion of addr to offset in syms_from_objfile is *not* done for mainline > sym files - but I don't know why. I also do not know why but fixed it now: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-01/msg00080.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-01/msg00039.html > Unless I still don't understand something it looks like we need to > coordinate to submit this patch. IIUC you haven't yet committed all your > PIE patches. Could you simply add it to your own patches set ? I will have to rebase the PIE patchset. I see I created a lot of needless rebasing by not checking-in the parts approved that time (and at least those just moving the code around). Regards, Jan