From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24529 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 22:14:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 24510 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2010 22:14:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:14:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o03MDsCt021950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:13:54 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o03MDqHj022829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:13:54 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o03MDpib001604; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:13:51 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o03MDpM1001603; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:13:51 +0100 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:14:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org, Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Regression: field type preservation: 7.0 -> 7.0.1+HEAD Message-ID: <20100103221351.GA1572@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100101184505.GA18391@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201001021308.19130.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100102203022.GA8372@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100103045717.GZ2788@adacore.com> <20100103054727.GA31207@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100103060305.GB2788@adacore.com> <20100103170603.GA28946@caradoc.them.org> <20100103192550.GA27582@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100103215230.GA13936@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100103215230.GA13936@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:52:30 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:25:50PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > For gdb_7_0-branch - is it OK to add the new ChangeLog entries without > > rotating ChangeLog to ChangeLog-2009? > > Yes. I don't think we should rotate on a released branch; that'll > just be a hassle. Checked-in now also on gdb_7_0-branch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-01/msg00027.html Thanks, Jan