From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7529 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 19:26:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 7512 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2010 19:26:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:26:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o03JPte4017745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:25:55 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o03JPq5N025950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:25:54 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o03JPprF027655; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:25:51 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o03JPoE6027651; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:25:50 +0100 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:26:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Regression: field type preservation: 7.0 -> 7.0.1+HEAD Message-ID: <20100103192550.GA27582@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100101184505.GA18391@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201001021308.19130.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20100102203022.GA8372@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100103045717.GZ2788@adacore.com> <20100103054727.GA31207@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100103060305.GB2788@adacore.com> <20100103170603.GA28946@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100103170603.GA28946@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:06:03 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > That would be fine with me - thanks for doing that. Confirmation from > > DanielJ would be nice, though, since he raised concerns about it. > > Hopefully all the comments we added will address them. > > It looks fine to me. Checked-in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-01/msg00026.html No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora12-linux-gnu for gdb_7_0-branch - but not checked-in there: For gdb_7_0-branch - is it OK to add the new ChangeLog entries without rotating ChangeLog to ChangeLog-2009? Thanks, Jan