From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18349 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2017 19:23:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18335 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2017 19:23:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:306c8a7, H*f:sk:306c8a7, H*i:sk:306c8a7 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:23:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DB8C05AA55; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1AJNVwT002104; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:23:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't send queries to the MI interpreter To: Simon Marchi , Simon Marchi References: <20170210163650.10334-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <89904751-7015-b272-98c1-33e786f7c356@redhat.com> <85ae4ad9-acdc-c9ba-6606-a7ac2abc7e2e@redhat.com> <0d8bd42f-5964-1ac7-414a-754540db2e95@redhat.com> <306c8a78-81e4-a2e2-a2ec-78081dbee1d2@ericsson.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <200cb81f-90f2-2eef-a8e1-08c9e7c2c785@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <306c8a78-81e4-a2e2-a2ec-78081dbee1d2@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 On 02/10/2017 07:07 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > I'm not sure I understand this part: > >> > it may be actually impossible to find >> > a way to this with MI on the secondary channel, that will >> > remain stable going forward. If we write a test today that relies on the output of a query that arguably shouldn't exist, then when we finally remove the query call, we must remove the test as well. Thanks, Pedro Alves