From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32457 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2009 11:51:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 32448 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2009 11:51:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:51:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98D72BAB8D; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5vHEPmGFKlxm; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2310B2BAB7C; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F8E1F5937; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:50:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patch for testing purposes Message-ID: <20091231115033.GL2788@adacore.com> References: <4B3B07F6.1020604@cyberfiber.org> <20091230081342.GD2788@adacore.com> <4B3B3AB1.5060106@cyberfiber.org> <20091230114518.GD548@adacore.com> <4B3C8D28.9070109@cyberfiber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B3C8D28.9070109@cyberfiber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 > here's a patch generated with the diff -up you suggested... hope it > makes things more clear. It looks like the patch you just sent (again, please send them in text format in the future) is against your own changes. Or maybe it's again another source tree, I'm not sure. But it does not seem to apply to the FSF tree at first glance. Can you send a patch against the HEAD sources? You can use either our CVS tree, or our git mirror to get those sources. http://www.sourceware.org/gdb/current/ Thank you, -- Joel