Re: [RFA] Fix verification of changed values for big values.

Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-12-30T20:00:31Z

On Wed 30 Dec 2009 17:21:23 Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > The purpose of the function is rather simple, so I didn't have much to
> > say. I added this description:
> >
> > /* Evaluate watchpoint condition expression and check if its value
> > changed. */
>
> Thanks. I thought it was important to explain what the real type of
> parameter P was so I added an extra sentence to the documentation.
> Patch attached.

Sorry about that. You mentioned that concern but it slipped my mind somehow.

> > You're right. IIRC I used gdb_expect because I wanted to explicitly check
> > for the gdb prompt in my regex, to avoid it being too greedy.
>
> Just for the fun of discussion (I am French, after all :-), I am
> pretty sure that you can also do that with gdb_test_multiple...

Nice. Thanks for the tip! It's even in the DeveloperTips page of the wiki. I
should have known. :-)