From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11532 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2009 21:12:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 11522 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Dec 2009 21:12:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:12:25 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2149910E65; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:12:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9FD10D51; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:12:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NPMt4-000128-CT; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:12:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Strip the ISA bit when printing symbol offsets Message-ID: <20091228211222.GB30551@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20091113212716.GA28795@caradoc.them.org> <20091113222444.GB4557@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091113222444.GB4557@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:24:44PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > 2009-11-13 Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > * defs.h (print_address_symbolic, build_address_symbolic): Update > > prototypes. > > * printcmd.c (print_address_symbolic): Take a gdbarch argument. > > Pass it to build_address_symbolic. All callers updated. > > (build_address_symbolic): Take a gdbarch argument. Use > > gdbarch_addr_bits_remove for functions. All callers updated. > > I tried to find something wrong with this, but couldn't :). > So, no objection. Thanks. I've belatedly committed this. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery